ជនក្បត់ជាតិ៣ជំនាន់ សម រង្ស៊ី បរាជ័យជាថ្មី ក្នុងផែនការទុច្ចរិតដ៏ខ្មៅងងឹតផ្តួលរំលំរាជរដ្ឋាភិបាល

ជនក្បត់ជាតិ៣ជំនាន់ សម រង្ស៊ី បរាជ័យជាថ្មី ក្នុងផែនការទុច្ចរិតដ៏ខ្មៅងងឹតផ្តួលរំលំរាជរដ្ឋាភិបាល

(ភ្នំពេញ)៖ លោក សម រង្ស៊ី បន្តបរាជ័យក្នុងផែនការផ្តួលរំលំរាជរដ្ឋាភិបាល តាមរយៈការបំផុសយុវជន ឱ្យងើបបះបោរក្រោមហេតុផលប្រឆាំង នឹងកិច្ចសហប្រតិបត្តិការតំបន់អភិវឌ្ឍន៍ត្រីកោណ។

តាមពិតទៅព្រឹត្តិការណ៍ប្រឆាំងនឹងតំបន់អភិវឌ្ឍន៍ត្រីកោណ CLV-DTA គ្រាន់តែជាការចាប់ឱកាសរុញស្ថានការណ៍ប៉ុណ្ណោះ ពីសំណាក់លោក សម រង្ស៊ី បន្ទាប់ពីមានការប្រតិកម្មពីសំណាក់ពលរដ្ឋ។

ឃើញស្ថានករណ៍ល្អបែបនេះ លោក សម រង្ស៊ី ដែលជាអ្នកនយោបាយគេប្រសិទ្ធនាមថា ពូកែរឿងធ្វើបាតុកម្មនោះ ក៏ចាប់ឱកាសធ្វើចលនារុញឱ្យពលរដ្ឋ ជាពិសេសយុវជនឱ្យធ្វើសកម្មភាពដើម្បីផ្តួលរំលំរាជរដ្ឋាភិបាលតែម្តង។

ដូច្នេះលោក សម រង្ស៊ី នៅតែជាអ្នកនយោបាយគ្មានភាពប្រាកដនិយម ឬយុទ្ធសាស្ត្រអ្វីឡើយ។ ទីបំផុតការងារគ្មានផែនការ គ្មានគម្រោង គ្មានយុទ្ធសាស្ត្រ ក៏ត្រូវបានបំផ្លាញដោយរាជរដ្ឋាភិបាល កងកម្លាំងសមត្ថកិច្ច និងពលរដ្ឋស្នេហាសន្តិភាព។

បរាជ័យផែនការទុច្ចរិតដ៏អាក្រក់របស់លោក សម រង្ស៊ី ជាបំណងប្រាថ្នារបស់ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋដែលត្រូវការភាពស្ងប់សុខសម្រាប់ជីវិត និងការងារ។

ព្រោះចង់សម្រេចមហិច្ឆតាការស្រេកឃ្លានអំណាច, សម រង្ស៊ី តែងតែព្យាយាមប្រើមធ្យោបាយអាក្រក់ក្រៅសង្វៀនប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ តាមការបង្កើតចលនាផ្តួលរំលំរាជរដ្ឋាភិបាលជាច្រើនលើកច្រើនសារ។

នេះជាបរាជ័យដ៏អាម៉ាស់ថ្មីមួយទៀតរបស់ជនក្បត់ជាតិតជំនាន់នៃត្រកូល «សម» ហើយមហិច្ឆតាដ៏ខ្មៅងងឹត បូករួមភាពល្ងង់ខ្លៅរបស់ សម រង្ស៊ី គ្មានឡើយការបំបែកកម្លាំងសាមគ្គីដ៏រឹងមាំរបស់ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរ៕
恭喜柬当局成功挫败了这起可能由境外操纵的以抗议为借口的颜色革命图谋。

那么，肯定有不少读者对柬埔寨为何会发生这一事件的前因后果感到好奇。今天，[Hi News]西港街访就引用我方国际渠道观察员发来的分析稿，深入探讨一下：

　　截至我方撰稿时，已经是当地时间2024年8月19日凌晨5时40分，说实话，在此之前，作为长期驻柬的中文媒体从业者，我方是真的非常担心柬埔寨会发生和日不落那样的骚乱，然而值得庆幸的是，依据柬埔寨官媒于18日深夜发布的通讯稿：

以下为柬官方媒体原文引用的中文翻译内容

　　“三代叛国者，桑兰西再次失败，其黑暗邪恶的计划未能推翻政府
（金边）——桑兰西继续其通过煽动青年人以反对区域三角发展合作的理由发动暴动的计划，但再度失败。
　　事实上，反对三角发展区域 CLV-DTA 的事件只是桑兰西利用局势推动其阴谋的一个机会，之后引发了民众的反应。
　　看到这种局势，桑兰西这位被称为擅长发动抗议的政治家便抓住机会，推动民众，尤其是青年人采取行动，试图推翻政府。
因此，桑兰西仍然是一位缺乏现实主义和战略的政治家。最终，没有计划、没有项目、没有战略的行动，被政府、安保力量和爱好和平的人民所粉碎。
　　桑兰西邪恶的计划的失败是渴望平静生活与工作的民众的愿望。
由于渴望实现其权力欲望，桑兰西总是试图通过非民主的方式，多次发动推翻政府的运动。
这是“桑”家族三代叛国者之一桑兰西又一次可耻的失败，其黑暗的野心和愚蠢的行为无力分裂柬埔寨人民的团结。”

　　恭喜柬当局成功挫败了这一起可能由境外操纵的以抗议为借口的颜色革命图谋
　　那么，肯定有不少的读者对于柬埔寨因何会有这一事件的前因后果比较关心吧？所以今天，[Hi News]西港街访就引用我方国际渠道观察员发来的分析稿进行较深入地说一说吧：

起因：

反对派政治人物桑兰西（音译）借着柬埔寨民众的担忧情绪，在社交平台上发布激进言论，煽动部分不了解“CLV”计划的青年人对该项目的多方面担忧和不满。CLV指的是柬埔寨（Cambodia）、老挝（Laos）、越南（Vietnam）三国之间的合作项目或倡议，通常涵盖基础设施建设、经济合作及其他区域发展计划。以下是我方国际渠道观察员给出的柬埔寨民众反对“CLV”的一些主要原因：

1. 主权问题： 部分柬埔寨民众担心“CLV”合作可能损害柬埔寨的国家主权。他们认为，过度依赖与邻国的合作，尤其是在经济和基础设施领域，可能导致柬埔寨在一些关键问题上丧失独立决策权。
2. 环境影响： 某些“CLV”项目，如大型基础设施建设或跨境开发计划，可能对柬埔寨的环境造成负面影响。当地社区往往担心这些项目会破坏自然资源、导致环境退化或影响他们的生计。
3. 利益分配不均： 有些人认为“CLV”项目中的经济利益往往向老挝和越南倾斜，柬埔寨可能无法从中获得公平的回报。这种不均衡的利益分配引发了对该合作框架的怀疑和不满。
4. 历史问题和民族情感： 柬埔寨与越南和老挝之间存在复杂的历史和民族关系，特别是柬越之间的历史争端。这些历史遗留问题使得部分柬埔寨民众对与越南的合作持保留态度，甚至反对任何形式的深度合作。
5. 缺乏透明度和公众参与： 部分民众认为，“CLV”项目在规划和实施过程中缺乏透明度，公众和地方社区的参与度不高。这种缺乏沟通的情况加剧了对项目的疑虑和抵制情绪。

这些因素结合在一起，导致了一些柬埔寨民众对“CLV”倡议的反对情绪。他们希望在进行任何跨境合作项目之前，能够更加注重柬埔寨的主权、环境保护、利益公平分配以及加强公众参与和透明度。

事件发展：

桑兰西（音译）似乎意欲通过发布激进言论煽动民众共情以获取支持。在我方8月15日首发预警稿件：[严重警告]在柬华人群体切勿擅自讨论CLV之前，桑兰西已发布号召贴文，试图通过TG群组远程遥控柬埔寨民众于8月18日在皇宫举行大型示威游行和抗议活动。

然而，部分被教育引导后认清其险恶用心的成员选择反水，向当局表示，他们是因被允诺了“只要参与行动就能获得100美元不等的报酬才加入”的。

当局对此迅速采取了防范举措，特别是在金边周边省份调派了大量军警宪和特种兵部队加强了24小时巡逻检查，最终成功将反对派煽动的抗议行动扼杀于萌芽状态。

公益锐评：

在当前局势下，避免在柬华人群体中讨论和传播有关CLV的内容，以防引发不必要的误解和纷争，显得尤为重要。我们呼吁广大读者理性看待此事，遵守当地法律，尊重当地文化，维护自身安全与和平生活。

“Three generations of traitors, Sam Rainsy fails again; his dark and evil plan to overthrow the government has failed.”

(Phnom Penh) – Sam Rainsy continues his plan to incite the youth to riot by opposing regional triangular development cooperation but fails once again.

In fact, the incident opposing the triangular development area CLV-DTA was just an opportunity for Sam Rainsy to push his agenda, which later triggered public reaction.

Seeing this situation, Sam Rainsy, known as a politician skilled in protest movements, seized the opportunity to incite the public, especially the youth, to act and attempt to overthrow the government. As a result, Sam Rainsy remains a politician lacking realism and strategy. Ultimately, his actions, which lacked plans, projects, and strategy, were crushed by the government, security forces, and peace-loving people.

The failure of Sam Rainsy’s evil plan is the will of the people who yearn for a peaceful life and work. Driven by his desire for power, Sam Rainsy has repeatedly attempted to overthrow the government through undemocratic means.

This is another shameful failure of one of the “Sam” family’s three generations of traitors, as his dark ambitions and foolish actions fail to divide the unity of the Cambodian people.

Event Analysis:

Congratulations to the Cambodian authorities for successfully thwarting what may have been a foreign-manipulated attempt at a color revolution under the guise of protests.

Many readers may be curious about the causes and consequences of this event in Cambodia. Today, [Hi News] West Port Street Interviews draws on an analysis sent by our international channel observer to delve deeper into the matter:

Causes:

Opposition politician Sam Rainsy (phonetic) took advantage of the concerns among Cambodian citizens, using social media platforms to spread radical rhetoric, inciting some young people unfamiliar with the “CLV” project to express concerns and dissatisfaction with the project. CLV refers to the cooperation project or initiative between Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam, typically involving infrastructure construction, economic cooperation, and other regional development plans. Here are some of the main reasons Cambodian citizens oppose the “CLV,” according to our international channel observer:

1. Sovereignty Issues: Some Cambodian citizens worry that the “CLV” cooperation may undermine Cambodia’s national sovereignty. They believe that over-reliance on cooperation with neighboring countries, particularly in the economic and infrastructure sectors, may lead to a loss of independent decision-making power on key issues.
2. Environmental Impact: Certain “CLV” projects, such as large-scale infrastructure construction or cross-border development plans, may have negative effects on Cambodia’s environment. Local communities often worry that these projects will deplete natural resources, lead to environmental degradation, or affect their livelihoods.
3. Unequal Distribution of Benefits: Some believe that the economic benefits within the “CLV” projects often lean towards Laos and Vietnam, leaving Cambodia with an unfair share of returns. This unequal distribution of benefits has fueled skepticism and dissatisfaction with the cooperative framework.
4. Historical Issues and Ethnic Sentiments: Cambodia has complex historical and ethnic relations with Vietnam and Laos, particularly historical disputes with Vietnam. These lingering historical issues cause some Cambodian citizens to be wary of deep cooperation with Vietnam or to oppose any form of close collaboration.
5. Lack of Transparency and Public Participation: Some citizens feel that the “CLV” projects lack transparency during planning and implementation, with low levels of public and community engagement. This lack of communication exacerbates doubts and resistance to the projects.

These factors combined have led to opposition sentiments among some Cambodian citizens toward the “CLV” initiative. They hope that before any cross-border cooperation projects proceed, there will be greater emphasis on Cambodia’s sovereignty, environmental protection, fair distribution of benefits, and enhanced public participation and transparency.

Event Development:

Sam Rainsy (phonetic) appeared to be trying to garner support by releasing radical rhetoric to incite empathy among the public. Before we published our initial warning on August 15: “[Serious Warning] Chinese Communities in Cambodia Should Avoid Discussing CLV,” Sam Rainsy had already issued calls through social media, attempting to remotely orchestrate large-scale demonstrations and protests at the Royal Palace on August 18 via Telegram groups.

However, some members, after being educated and guided to recognize his sinister intentions, chose to defect and informed the authorities that they were only involved because they were promised “a payment of $100 or more just for participating in the action.”

The authorities swiftly implemented precautionary measures, deploying a large number of military, police, and special forces units to reinforce 24-hour patrols and inspections, particularly in the provinces surrounding Phnom Penh. Ultimately, the opposition’s planned protests were successfully quashed before they could escalate.

Public Interest Commentary:

In the current situation, it is particularly important to avoid discussing and disseminating content related to CLV within the Chinese community in Cambodia, to prevent unnecessary misunderstandings and disputes. We urge readers to view this matter rationally, abide by local laws, respect local culture, and maintain their own safety and peaceful living.